| |
Current Issue
Subscription Services
Back Issues
Advertising
Distribution
About Us
Art and Industry
Film Comment Archive
Film Comment Selects
Cronenberg’s take on the American way
Murrow, McCarthy, and TV before the fall
The J-Word
Plus, an ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: An interview with Grant
Heslov
The studio that gave us both Ozu and Oshima
Plus, an ONLINE EXCLUSIVE SIDEBAR
The iconclast’s iconclast
Hollywood’s summer slump explained
A remarriage at gunpoint
The Japanese master rediscovered
Plus, an ONLINE EXCLUSIVE: The uncut article
Vietnam flashback
|
|

That Kido should be branded a war criminal by postwar
U.S. occupation forces for the fistful of military-themed
movies he’d produced against his better judgment
would never cease to gall him, especially as he suspected
that the envy of rival studio bosses was secretly
to blame. He nevertheless began capitulating anew.
Following occupation directives, he ordered the maker
of the flavorsomely titled battle-cry Songs of
Allied Destruction (45) to spice up the following
year’s Twenty Year Old Youth with
Japan’s first big-screen kiss. In the Fifties
Shochiku grew less and less pioneering in its productions,
concentrating mainly on “women’s pictures” that
moved increasingly away from the hard-hitting headlines
of Mizoguchi’s Women of the Night (48),
and toward the mildly satirical brassiness of Keisuke
Kinoshita’s Carmen Comes Home (51),
Japan’s first full-color feature. The home
drama flourished, and an ever less conspicuously
capricious Ozu continued his watch over Shochiku’s
ever quieter house. One mark of Kido’s post-war
resentment would nevertheless remain: where the Occupation
forces had declared depictions of Mt. Fuji as “too
feudal,” the minute MacArthur’s forces
sailed off into the sunset, Kido ordered up the baby-blue
skies and snow-capped vista of Fuji’s mountaintop
that serves as Shochiku’s logo to this day.
With the Sixties approaching and the box office
sliding, Kido—having missed the boat on the
sensationalized taiyozoku (sun tribe) youth
flicks that had recently earned healthy returns for
Nikkatsu and Daiei—decided to break with company
policy and promote a fledgling and fresh-idea-filled
filmmaker not yet 30 years old. The risk seemed small
enough, and the potential payoff in youth-market
revenues large, but what seemed like foresight would
soon prove exactly the sort of self-inflicted blindside
that would contribute to Donald Richie’s characterization
of Kido’s once-venerated and seemingly invincible
dream factory as “the hapless Shochiku.”
That
filmmaker was Nagisa Oshima, whose “New Wave” 1960
trilogy—Cruel Story of Youth, The
Sun’s Burial, and Night and Fog in
Japan—proved so ideologically corrosive
and politically incendiary that an infuriated Kido
finally yanked the third installment from theaters
after just three days. Oshima’s resignation
from the studio quickly followed, as did his resolution
to change the shape of Japanese film forever. Kido
had developed cold feet over the films he’d
financed in the past, even holding up the release
of Ozu’s I Was Born, But… when
the director worried that it had turned out “unexpectedly
dark.” But, having buried the sun but a few
months previously, Oshima fully intended that Night
and Fog in Japan be more than simply dark; it
would be a plummet into the eternal pitch. Deliberately
dense with overlapping flashbacks and bilious recriminations,
the film is a banshee’s wail about the follies
of youth and the failures of revolutionary street
politics, staged in Brechtian blackouts and shot
in slitheringly theatricalized long takes. Scarcely
the sort of youth flick Kido had hoped might click
with audiences, Night and Fog was more akin
to a high-art horror movie about a wedding ceremony
for rabid werewolves, where the guests continually
lunge at one another with salutatory toasts that
climax in, “I’d like to tear you all
to bits!”
Critically speaking, Kido’s
promotion of Oshima to director in 1959 proved
far more disastrous than his years-earlier alternations
between indifference and antipathy that resulted
in the ouster or voluntary exiting of Shochiku
auteurs including Shimizu, Mizoguchi, and Mikio
Naruse, of whom the emotionally color-blind Kido
once quipped, “We’ve already got an
Ozu.” (Shohei Imamura and Seijun Suzuki both
began as director’s assistants at Shochiku,
though both left before making any films of their
own.) Indeed, one can only begin to imagine the
chagrin of the Ozu-loving executive when, having
failed to cash in on both the taiyozoku craze
and the giant monster jamboree that was keeping
Toho afloat, he realized he’d inadvertently
created a teenaged Frankenstein that was suddenly
belching fire all over the home dramas that served
as the studio’s aesthetic backyard. And yet
here came Oshima—a towering, untamable behemoth
born from the black-market bile of the American
occupation! A defiant and gigantic boy glowering
down at the grown-ups as he crashes into everything!
Castle Shochiku’s home-grown Anti-Ozu!
Not that the old tofu vendor
himself appeared, on the surface, particularly
concerned. Perhaps Ozu had simply managed to internalize
all those elliptical absences from his movies,
and let whatever nuisances the noisome Oshima might
have posed disappear into the Zen spacelessness
of a synaptic splice. Still, the presence/absence
issues that he’d long been tinkering with
continued. A decade earlier, Ozu had worried that
the climax of Late Spring (49),
with Chisu Ryu silently peeling an apple as he
sits alone in his house at the end of his daughter’s
wedding day, smacked rather heavily of art-for-art’s-sake.
Now he found himself working for a studio where,
in movies like Cruel Story of Youth, the
teenaged thug and apprentice pimp who passed for
the movie’s hero wouldn’t just ruminatively
regard that apple; he’d pornographically
devour it while pouring sweat and pondering the
supine body of his girlfriend, still under anesthesia
from the abortion he’d ordered her to have
an hour before.
That Ozu may have never even
seen Oshima’s films is possible, though unlikely.
The reverse is less likely still. A former film
critic, Oshima knew exactly where he’d come
from, and when he determined to sabotage his cinema’s
history, he knew exactly how short to cut the fuse.
Take another look at the moment in Cruel Story when
that “heroic” pimp meets his permanently
pouting girlfriend, whose innocence he’ll
soon violate in a log-filled harbor not far from
Shimizu’s old hooker-stroll. Rushing in to
rescue her from the geezer who’s given her
a ride and begun to get grabby, our pimp-hero beats
the would-be masher down to the concrete, stands
to straighten his jacket, and as he turns to ask
if sweater-girl’s all right, does a sudden,
stiletto-sharp 360-degree spin on his heels—exactly
the sort of well-rehearsed show-offery that every
boy and boy-hoodlum back on Planet Ozu used to
do. Is that the scent of tofu burning? Ozu smelled
it too. Returning from his mother’s funeral,
he wrote in his diary: “Spring has arrived.
Cherry blossoms are in full bloom. Here I am agonizing
over An Autumn Afternoon. Like torn rags,
the cherry blossoms display a forlorn expression—sake
tastes as bitter as gall.”
Oshima continued, after a time,
to let the studio distribute the films he went
on to make through independent means. In 2000,
he returned to make one final film under the Shochiku
insignia, the deeply subversive jidai-geki entitled Gohatto—a
film in which a whisper is made to seem altogether
more radical than a scream. Ozu—whose first
film, now forever lost, was a jidai-geki called The
Sword of Penitence—finally took his
leave from Shochiku, and slipped the surly bonds
of earth as well, in 1963. His tombstone is famously
inscribed with the Japanese character that signifies
nothingness; it is pronounced, with a whisper, “mu.” Kido
(whose grandson, a former lawyer with degrees from
Harvard and ucla, now runs Shochiku) hung on until
his retirement in 1977. Later that same year, Ozu’s
one-time assistant director, Shohei Imamura—who’d
once famously remarked that while he was but a
farmer, Oshima was a samurai—returned to
the studio with a new project. What might Imamura
have been imagining when he titled it Vengeance
is Mine?
© 2005 by Chuck Stephens
|